geschrieben von Heli O Retzek an einen amerikanischen Kollegen, der
sich fragt, was es denn mit diesen mysteriösen Künzli-Punkten auf sich
Sorry to harrass you with such a
long mail - I am aware that your time is precious and that I should state
my message within 30 seconds, but I am convinced you have to know certain
developments in Europes homeopathy to judge wether some "Kuenzli-Points"
would be interesting or not.
I guess there is just one "sector" within homeopathy that is not
so very well known in the States and among most of contemporary
This people I am talking about call themselfs "classical
homeopaths", they are mainly Germans and Swiss and represent a certain
fraction among the homeopaths nowadays.
Most of them are kind'a trained by a certain "school". This
School was founded in Europe by Pierre Schmidt, who brought homeopathy
back to Europe where it almost died out during the first and second world
homeopathy in USA at the beginning of this century from a direct pupil of
P. Schmidt was a very serious "Kentian" pupil, he translated
kents philosophy into french and had a few pupils.
Well known pupils from P. Schmidt are HORST BARTHEL,
who wrote later on "Synthetic Repertory" and some other books.
His son Michael founded the "Barthel Verlag", publishing this
orange covered books.
Another very important pupil, probably the most important pupil of
P.Schmidt was JOST KUENZLI von FIMMELSBERG (this
swiss people always have this funny names).
Kuenzli was a very strict Kentian and brought a huge revival of the theory
of chronic disease from Hahnemann back then in the 60ths
Kuenzli started to work Hahnemanns Chronic Disease into Kents Repertory -
the Result is well known as the "Repertorium
Generale", that is also in English available.
Kuenzli really made a difference and some influence
in the german speaking corner, as he held many seminars and thus tought
many young homeopaths.
His main teaching was "learn from Kent",
"learn from Hahnemann",
he had a very impressiv knowledge about theory of
homeopathy and a special style of treating. He strictly obayed the "rules",
he waited always the time the remedy takes, he didnt change remedies in
the 50M potency on a weekly bases as one can read it e.g. in the American
Small remedy Seminars .....,
thus he had most cases just running on one or 2
remedies over 20 years.
DARIO SPINEDI was the
only pupil who used to follow him everywhere, to sit for 15 years in every
lecture of Kuenzli, to call him up in every difficult case.
Spindi himself became in the last couple of years a
very impressiv influence in our language corner. He fills Seminars with
300 people, most of his "pupils" travel to each of his seminar.
His teaching is basically everything "Kuenzli
-> Kent -> Hahnemann".
Spinedi founded a homeopathic clinic in Switzerland
some years ago to treat very advanced disease, mostly cancer cases.
Now we can say that their way of
treatment is extremly successfully in advanced disease. He routinly can
cure about 50% of the cancer cases, most of them are advanced or even
above any allopathic treatment options. This is not just prattling, they
really give us some impressiv datas.
Their way of treatment as basically according to
Kuenzly->P.Schmidt->Kent->Hahnemann, and just as those old
masters used in their praxis for chronic cases not more than 10-12
remedies overall, the Clinica St. Croce people heal most cancer cases just
with Phos, Nit-ac, Sep, Lach, Ars, Thuja ... with just a very few of
Kuenzli has left us with some gift: this is a
notification which rubrics in the (normal Kent-) repertory have often been
able to "solve" such a chronic case.
(I have to admit, this is purely for real chronic
disease, for "pathology" - not for pure mental states")
using those Rubriks as a starter for elimination you
are on the save side: e.g. recurring fever blisters, wens, cracks in
corners of mouth, warts, scaly eruptions ....
all rubrics that show some damage to the integrity
of the physical body of the patient, all rubrics that are cited by
hahnemann in CD as signs of latent or rising Psora (which means signs of
outbreaking serious chronic disease).
This rubrics have some advantage in working with:
1. you cut away all the modern - not clinical
verified remedies, you are mainly left with ANTIPSORIC remedies (which
means remedies that have the ability to heal chronic disease
2. they are the most important starting rubriks for
serious cases, for cancer cases ....
3. they are clinically verified by (here in our
corner) undisputed masters who healed most cases.
There is no secret about such rubrics, this are no
further additions, this is just some sign of higher significance or
importance of certain physical signs in the case.
E.g.: if you heal the present "Theme" of
the patient, make him free of his "life problem", but the
fever-blisters, warts, nevi and wens stay on the body, you did not touch
deeper levels of the chronic, miasmatic process that he inherited from mom
& dad who died of cancer and this chronic disease will proceed,
finally kill the patient.
By putting the significance of this signs into the
limelight (e.g. by eliminating with the rubrik "wens"), you deal
right away with remedies that have proven to have the ability to heal wens,
so you touch the deep level.
This is in some contradiction with Massimos or
Rajans Teaching, who say: every remedy may heal everything, if it is the
I guess, maybe because I - we -hardly ever
find the right one, being average and not so brilliant homeopaths.
But still, using above cited "theory" in
mind, I myself - as some average homepath - have some dozend nicely healed
cancer cases, not to compare with SPINDEDI, who has some cases, where even
liver metastases went away, now with long year follow up.
Spinedis books are not available in English, he
purely teaches in around here, he is not interested in fame nor travelling,
so this things are not so well known internationally.
OK: now you know pretty everything you need to know
about "Kuenzli Points"
1. There are homeopaths who work extremly close to
Hahnemann, trained by Kuenzli, Spinedy and similars
2. Spinedy has proven repeatedly, that with this
"orginal Hahnemann" approach you can heal even very advanced
cancer states or other serious chronic diseases
3. an important tool to do so is the knowledge of
the so called "Point-Rubrics". This are certain Rubrics in the
repertory that are just marked by color, a point or underlining or by
anything, just that the reader knows: "if your patient suffers this
sympom, please put it high up in ranking - if you do not heal
this symptom you did not heal the chronic deep seating process, even if he
does fine mentally"
Where are these rubrics: they are in every repertory,
but only Barthels Repertory Generaly has printed them with a dot
preceeding, this is why we call them "point-rubrics".